The UK’s Intellectual Property Office has decided artificial-intelligence systems cannot patent inventions for the time being.
Patents assign the ownership of a new invention to its creator.
A recent IPO consultation found many experts doubted AI was currently able to invent without human assistance.
Current law allowed humans to patent inventions made with AI assistance, the government said, despite “misperceptions” this was not the case.
Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled against Stephen Thaler, who had said his Dabus AI system should be recognised as the inventor in two patent applications, for:
a food container
a flashing light
The judges sided, by a two-to-one majority, with the IPO, which had told him to list a real person as the inventor.”Only a person can have rights – a machine cannot,” wrote Lady Justice Laing in her judgement.
“A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person.”
But the IPO also said it would “need to understand how our IP system should protect AI-devised inventions in the future” and committed to advancing international discussions, with a view to keeping the UK competitive.
In July 2021, in a case also brought by Mr Thaler, an Australian court decided AI systems could be recognised as inventors for patent purposes.
Days earlier, South Africa had issued a similar ruling.
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541827984569487360
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541828235674091520
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541828775099322368
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541829053852778496
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541829740976242688
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541829926834241536
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541830646434189312
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541832229016403968
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541832439394304000
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541832912251748352
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541833338573377536
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541833664042991616
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541836893841608704
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541837004739018752
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541837273635835904
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541837529345785856
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541837686644756480
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541837958666342400
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541838142259417088
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541838543813693440
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541838733215879168
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541838897179623424
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839011919003648
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839192584441856
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839276466327552
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839609972228096
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839707644973056
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541839894685777920
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541840048436379648
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541840385360613376
https://c.realme.com/id/post-details/1541840608640204800
https://geany.org/p/Jon1P/
https://ideone.com/zG7jdc
https://yamcode.com/3geqrh2dn9
https://pasteio.com/xSx6eD9hdDAN
https://p.teknik.io/9jl9R
https://bitbin.it/BmhbQxAR/
https://notes.io/qtD6P
https://txt.fyi/-/22178/07262b5c/
https://controlc.com/fa6d426a
http://cpp.sh/9a7f7
https://paste2.org/pFpCxGwe
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/c3892dd2-ac80-4f22-b347-99e881321b21
https://paiza.io/projects/scGIgI_tgs3DmNN-3oi5Aw?language=php
https://dotnetfiddle.net/qaimaG
https://pastebin.com/Yhx8Gs6V
https://jsfiddle.net/f7zwqpnd/
https://rextester.com/CSVES45744
https://www.wowace.com/paste/960a3866
https://techplanet.today/post/uk-decides-ai-still-cannot-patent-inventions
https://www.click4r.com/posts/g/4823599/uk-decides-ai-still-cannot-patent-inventions
https://www.scoop.it/topic/uk-decides-ai-still-cannot-patent-inventions
https://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/oldlavender/post/1381169285
https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/10488654/
https://zenodo.org/communities/ukdecidesaipatenventions
https://simobrokklyi.cookpad-blog.jp/articles/731470
https://open.firstory.me/story/cl4yhehqd03d401xjfcmd5mrj
https://theprose.com/post/485504/uk-decides-ai-still-cannot-patent-inventions
https://www.rw-forum.com/topic/184022-uk-decides-ai-still-cannot-patent-inventions/
Many AI systems are trained on large amounts of data copied from the internet.
And, on Tuesday, the IPO also announced plans to change copyright law to allow anyone with lawful access – rather than only those conducting non-commercial research, as now – to do this, to “promote the use of AI technology, and wider ‘data mining’ techniques, for the public good”.
Rights holders will still be able to control and charge for access to their works but no longer charge extra for the ability to mine them.
An increasing number of people are using AI tools such as DALL.E 2 to create images resembling a work of human art.
And Mr Thaler has recently sued the US Copyright Office over its refusal to recognise a software system as the “author” of an image, the Register reported.Actors’ livelihoods
In the consultation, the IPO noted the UK was one of only a handful of countries to protect computer-generated works with no human creator.
The “author” of a “computer-generated work” is defined as “the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken”, it says.
And protection lasts for 50 years from when the work is made.
Performing-arts workers’ union Equity had called for copyright law to be changed to protect actors’ livelihoods from AI content such as “deepfakes”, generated from images of their face or voice.
The IPO took this issue seriously, it said, but “at this stage, the impacts of AI technologies on performers remain unclear”.
“We will keep these issues under review,” it added.
